1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Background

1.1.1 The Project is located in the south-eastern part of Kowloon Peninsula, comprising the apron and runway areas of the former Kai Tak Airport and existing waterfront areas at To Kwa Wan, Ma Tau Kok, Kowloon Bay, Kwun Tong and Cha Kwo Ling. It covers a land area of about 328 hectares. The Project also covers Kowloon Bay and Kwun Tong Typhoon Shelter and the adjacent water bodies.

1.1.2 The Kai Tak Airport was the international airport of Hong Kong until 6 July 1998, which was replaced by the new Hong Kong International Airport at the Chek Lap Kok. After closure, the airport site has been occupied by various temporarily uses such as public fill banks, bus depots, car sales exhibitions, and recreational grounds. Besides, most of the original buildings and structures within the former airport site have been cleared and the ground contamination identified at the north apron had been decontaminated.

1.1.3 In 2002, the Chief Executive in Council approved the Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plans (No. S/K19/3 and S/K21/3) to provide the statutory framework to proceed with the South East Kowloon Development at the former Kai Tak Airport. However, following the judgment of the Court of Final Appeal in January 2004 regarding the Harbour reclamation, the originally proposed development which involved reclamation has to be reviewed. The Kai Tak Planning Review (KTPR) has resulted a Preliminary Outline Development Plan (PODP) for Kai Tak in October 2006.

1.1.4 Based on the PODP, Planning Department have prepared the Draft Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/K22/1 and was submitted to the Town Planning Board for consideration on 10 November 2006 and was gazetted under the Town Planning Ordinance on 24 November 2006 and the OZP No. S/K22/2 was approved by CE in C on 6 November 2007.

1.1.5 A Recommended Outline Development Plan (RODP) of Kai Tak Development has been prepared by resembling the changes to the PODP and the Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan (OZP). The RODP (dated May 2008) becomes the basis for conducting the EIA study for the feasibility study of the Kai Tak Development. A copy of the RODP (dated May 2008) is shown in Figure 1.1a.

1.1.6 This Project falls within item 1 under Schedule 3 of the EIAO, i.e. engineering feasibility study of urban development project with a study area covering more than 20 hectares or involving a total population of more than 100,000.

1.1.7 This Project also contains various Schedule 2 Designated Projects (DPs) that, under the EIAO, require Environmental Permits (EPs) to be granted by the DEP before they may be either constructed or operated. Details of the Schedule 2 DPs are described in the EIA Report.

1.1.8 Three of the Schedule 2 DPs, namely the Decommissioning of the Former Kai Tak Airport other than the North Apron, Kai Tak North Apron Decommissioning, and the Dredging Works for Proposed Cruise Terminal at Kai Tak, have already been covered under separate EIA Reports that were approved under the EIAO. The EM&A requirements for these 3 Schedule 2 DPs have already been detailed in the respective EM&A Manual.

1.1.9 The environmental impacts of another three Schedule 2 DPs as listed in Table 1.1 below namely new distributor roads serving the planned KTD (DP1), new sewage pumping stations serving the planned KTD (DP2), and decommissioning of the remaining parts of the former Kai Tak Airport (DP3) have been adequately addressed in this Schedule 3 EIA Report. Figure 1.2 shows the locations of these Schedule 2 DPs. The remaining Schedule 2 DPs will be addressed in further detailed EIA studies by the respective project proponents in the future.

Table 1.1 List of Schedule 2 Designated Projects Contained within the Kai Tak Development that have been Adequately Addressed in this Schedule 3 EIA Report

Item	Designated Project	EIAO Reference
DP1	New distributor roads serving the planned KTD	Schedule 2, Part I, Items A.1, A.8 & A.9. Partly referred in Section 1.3 (ii) of EIA Study Brief No. ESB- 152/2006.
DP2	New sewage pumping stations serving the planned KTD	Schedule 2, Part I, Item F.3. Partly referred in Section 1.3 (iii) of EIA Study Brief No. ESB-152/2006.
DP3a	Decommissioning of the remaining parts (Ex-GFS Building and Radar Station) of the former Kai Tak Airport	Schedule 2, Part II, Item 1

1.1.10 Broad descriptions of the Schedule 2 DPs listed in Table 1.1 above are given in the following paragraphs.

1.1.11 DP1 - New distributor roads serving the planned KTD

l The major elements of the future ground level road system within KTD include four district distributor roads namely Roads D1, D2, D3 and D4. No new primary distributor road is proposed within KTD. As Roads D1 to D4 are district distributor roads, they are classified as DPs under Item A.1, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO. A section of Road D2 will be running underneath the podium structure of the proposed Stadium Complex. Based on the latest available information, that section of Road D2 is fully enclosed by decking above and by structure on the sides for more than 100 m and is thus classified as DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO. For Road D3, a section of road bridge will be constructed above the 600m gap opening. Therefore, it is classified as DP under Item A.8, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

1.1.12 DP2 - New sewage pumping stations serving the planned KTD

l Six sewage pumping stations (SPSs), excluding the proposed SPS of the DWFI compound at JVBC (JVBC-PS) as described under DP15 below, are located within KTD. As part of the sewerage improvement scheme in the hinterland to reduce the pollution loading in KTAC, DSD will initially construct two new SPSs, namely PS1 and PS3. These two SPSs are tentatively programmed to be completed in 2012 to convey sewage flow generated from the hinterland to To Kwa Wan Preliminary Treatment Work. PS6 will have to be completed in later 2011 in time for commissioning of the Phase I Berth of the Cruise Terminal in 2012. PS1A is designed to convey sewage flow generated from the public housing sites, schools and residential sites. It has been determined that PS1A is not required for the initial population intake of public housing developments in Sites 1A and 1B in September 2012. Instead the initial sewage flow collected from these housing sites will be discharged directly to the existing sewer along Eastern Road via new gravity sewer as an interim measures. PS1A is planned to be available 2014 or earlier. The reprovision of SPS (NPS) located in the Site 5A1 will be available in 2014. PS2 is located at the Site 1L5 and designed to convey sewage flows generated in the developments in Sites 1M, 1P, 1K, 1L 2A and 2B.

l All these SPSs, except PS6, are with an installed capacity of more than 2000 m3 per day and are located within 150m from existing and/or planned residential area or educational institution, therefore these SPSs are classified as DPs under Item F.3, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

l The proposed PS6 is located near the southern tip of the former Kai Tak Airport runway. The installed capacity of PS6 is more than 2,000m³ but less than 300,000m³ per day. PS6 is located at more than 150m away from any existing or planned residential area, place of worship, educational institution, health care institution, site of special scientific interest, site of cultural heritage, bathing beach, marine park or marine reserve, fish culture zone, or seawater intake point. Therefore with reference to Item f.3, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO, the proposed PS6 is not classified as a DP under the EIAO.

1.1.13 DP3a - Decommissioning of the remaining parts (Ex-GFS Building and Radar Station) of the former Kai Tak Airport

l The scope of this DP is primarily to decommission the Ex-GFS Building and Radar Station within the former Kai Tak Airport that were not covered under the previous EIAs on decommissioning of former Kai Tak Airport (namely EIAs for DP4 and DP5).

l The decommissioning of airport facilities is classified as DP under Item 1, Part II, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

1.1.14 Road D3A and Road D4A are dual 2-lane district distributor roads within the Runway Precinct of the Kai Tak Development (KTD) as shown in Figure 1.1. Road D3A is running along the centre of the Runway Precinct and is replacing the original southern section of Road D3 that runs along the waterfront of the Runway Precinct. Road D4A is an extension of Road D4A connecting Road D4 with the proposed Road D3A (AEIAR/170-2013).

1.1.15 Both Road D3A and Road D4A will play an important role in linking up all the development areas in Runway Precinct of KTD with the hinterland (AEIAR/170-2013).

1.2 Project Scope and Programme

1.2.1 The scope of the works include :

(i) Construction of a section of dual two-lane Road D3 (Metro Park Section) (MPS) of about 1,130 metres (m) long connecting Road D2 at the former north apron and Road D3A at the former runway, including about 200m under a section of dual two-lane Road D3 (Metro Park Section) (MPS) of about 1,130 metres (m) long connecting Road D2 at the former north apron and Road D3A at the former runway, including 200m underpass with associated 320m depressed road, 360m elevated road and 250m at grade road;

(ii) A single two-lane Road L12d of about 47m long connecting Road D3A at the former runway;

(iii) A salt water pumping station and associated water intake;

(iv) A sewage pumping station; and

(v) Landscaped deck of about 380m long in total with a minimum width of about 11m above Road D3 (MPS) and landscaped area adjoining Road D3 (MPS) providing a total of about 3.9 hectares of public open space.

1.2.2 The scope of the Project comprises (AEIAR/170-2013):

a) Construction of approximately 1.5km long dual 2-lanecarriageway along the former runway;

b) Construction of footpath;

c) Construction of approximately 1.5km long landscaped deck above the dual 2-lane carriageway along the former runway; and

d) Ancillary works including drains, sewers, fresh and salt water supply mains, utilities, landscape softwork and hardworks.

1.3 Purpose of this Manual (AEIAR/130-2009 and AEIAR/170-2013)

1.3.1 The purpose of this Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual is to guide the set up of an EM&A programme to ensure compliance with the EIA study recommendations, to assess the effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures and to identify any further need for additional mitigation measures or remedial action. This Manual outlines the monitoring and audit programme for the proposed Project. It aims to provide systematic procedures for monitoring, auditing and minimising environmental impacts associated with Project activities.

1.3.2 Hong Kong environmental regulations and the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines have served as environmental standards and guidelines in the preparation of this Manual. In addition, the EM&A Manual has been prepared in accordance with the requirements stipulated in Annex 21 of the EIAO-TM.

1.3.3 This Manual contains the following information:

l Responsibilities of the Contractor, the Project Manager or Supervisor, Environmental Team (ET) and Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) with respect to the environmental monitoring and audit requirements during the course of the Project;

l Project organisation;

l The basis for, and description of the broad approach underlying the EM&A programme;

l Requirements with respect to the construction programme schedule and the necessary environmental monitoring and audit programme to track the varying environmental impact;

l Details of the methodologies to be adopted, including all field laboratories and analytical procedures, and details on quality assurance and quality control programme;

l The rationale on which the environmental monitoring data will be evaluated and interpreted;

l Definition of Action and Limit Levels;

l Establishment of Event and Action Plans;

l Requirements for reviewing pollution sources and working procedures required in the event of non-compliance with the environmental criteria and complaints;

l Requirements for presentation of environmental monitoring and audit data and appropriate reporting procedures; and

l Requirements for review of EIA predictions and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures / environmental management systems and the EM&A programme.

1.3.4 For the purpose of this manual, the ET leader, who shall be responsible for and in charge of the ET, shall refer to the person delegated the role of executing the EM&A requirements.

1.4 Project Organization (AEIAR/130-2009 and AEIAR/170-2013)

1.4.1 The roles and responsibilities of the various parties involved in the EM&A process are outlined in the following paragraphs. The proposed Project organization and lines of communication with respect to environmental management for the Project are shown in Figure 1.3 (Figure 1.2 of (AEIAR/170-2013).

Figure 1.3 Project Organisation

1.4.2 The duties and responsibilities of respective parties are as follows:

The Contractor

1.4.3 The Contractor shall report to the Engineer. The duties and responsibilities of the Contractor are:

l To provide assistance to ET in carrying out monitoring;

l To submit proposals on mitigation measures in case of exceedances of Action and Limit Levels in accordance with the Event and Action Plans;

l To implement measures to reduce impact where Action and Limit Levels are exceeded;

l To implement the corrective actions instructed by the Engineer;

l To accompany joint site inspection undertaken by the ET; and

l To adhere to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation.

Environmental Team

1.4.4 The ET Leader and the ET shall be employed to conduct the EM&A programme and ensure the Contractor’s compliance with the Project’s environmental performance requirements during construction. The ET Leader shall be an independent party from the Contractor and have relevant professional qualifications, or have sufficient relevant EM&A experience subject to the approval of the Engineer’s Representative (ER). The ET shall be led and managed by the ET leader. The ET leader shall possess at least 7 years experience in EM&A and/or environmental management.

1.4.5 The duties and responsibilities of the ET are:

l To monitor various environmental parameters as required in this EM&A Manual;

l To analyse the environmental monitoring and audit data and review the success of EM&A programme to cost-effectively confirm the adequacy of mitigation measures implemented and the validity of the EIA predictions and to identify any adverse environmental impacts arising;

l To carry out regular site inspection to investigate and audit the Contractors' site practice, equipment and work methodologies with respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation, and effect proactive action to pre-empt problems; carry out ad hoc site inspections if significant environmental problems are identified;

l To audit and prepare monitoring and audit reports on the environmental monitoring data and site environmental conditions;

l To report on the environmental monitoring and audit results to the IEC, Contractor, the ER and EPD or its delegated representative;

l To recommend suitable mitigation measures to the Contractor in the case of exceedance of Action and Limit Levels in accordance with the Event and Action Plans; and

l To adhere to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation.

Engineer or Engineer’s Representative

1.4.6 The Engineer is responsible for overseeing the construction works and for ensuring that the works undertaken by the Contractor in accordance with the specification and contractual requirements. The duties and responsibilities of the Engineer with respect to EM&A may include:

l Supervising the Contractor’s activities and ensure that the requirements in the EM&A Manual are fully complied with;

l Informing the Contractor when action is required to reduce impacts in accordance with the Event and Action Plans;

l Participating in joint site inspection undertaken by the ET; and

l Adhering to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation.

Independent Environmental Checker

1.4.7 The Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) shall advise the Engineer’s Representative on environmental issues related to the Project. The IEC shall possess at least 7 years experience in EM&A and/or environmental management. The IEC shall be an independent part from the Contractor and the ET.

1.4.8 The duties and responsibilities of the IEC are:

l To review the EM&A works performed by the ET (at least at monthly intervals);

l To carry out random sample check and audit the monitoring activities and results (at least at monthly intervals);

l To review the EM&A reports submitted by the ET;

l To review the effectiveness of environmental mitigation measures and project environmental performance;

l To review the proposal on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Event and Action Plans; and

l To adhere to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation.

1.4.9 Sufficient and suitably qualified professional and technical staff shall be employed by the respective parties to ensure full compliance with their duties and responsibilities, as required under the EM&A programme for the duration of the Project.

1.5 Key Location Plan of contract ED/2018/01

The key location plan of this contract is attached in Appendix C.

1.6 Programme of contract ED/2018/01

The Accepted Programme of this contract is attached in Appendix D.

1.7 EM&A Programme of Register No. AEIAR-130/2009

According to Condition 3.1 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-337/2009, the EM&A Programme shall be implemented in accordance with the procedures and requirements as set out in sections 1, 2, 15 & 16 of the EM&A Manual of the approved EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-130/2009), therefore Sections 3 to 14 of the Kai Tak Development EM&A Manual are not applicable to this contract.

1.8 EM&A Programme of Register No. AEIAR-170/2013

According to Condition 3.1 of the EM&A Manual with Register No. AEIAR-170/2013 under Environmental Permit Nos. EP-445/2013 & EP-445/2013/A respectively, the EM&A Programme shall be implemented in accordance with the procedures and requirements as set out in the EM&A Manual. We considered section 6 is relevant to the Project and thus we incorporate this section in the EM&A Manual.

2 EM&A ON NEW DISTRIBUTOR ROADS SERVING THE PLANNED KTD

2.1 Introduction

2.1.1 This section details the specific EM&A requirements for Schedule 2 DP1: New Distributor Roads Serving the Planned KTD. The requirements, methodology, equipment, monitoring locations, criteria and protocols for the monitoring and audit of this DP are presented. The project organisation, site environmental audit and reporting requirements are stipulated in Chapters 1, 15 & 16 of this Manual respectively.

2.2 Air Quality Impact

2.2.1 Monitoring and audit of the TSP levels shall be carried out during the construction phase by the ET to ensure that any deteriorating air quality could be readily detected and timely action taken to rectify the situation.

2.2.2 1-hour and 24-hour average TSP levels shall be measured to indicate the impacts of construction dust on air quality. The 24-hour average TSP levels shall be measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in the Title 40 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. Upon agreement from the Engineer’s Representative (ER) and the IEC, 1-hour average TSP levels can be measured by direct reading methods to indicate short-term impacts.

2.2.3 All relevant data including temperature, pressure, weather conditions, elapsed-time meter reading for the start and stop of the sampler, identification and weight of the filter paper, other local atmospheric factors affecting or affected by site conditions and work progress of the concerned site etc. shall be recorded in detail. A sample data record sheet based on the one presented in the EM&A Guidelines for Development Projects in Hong Kong is shown in Appendix B. The ET Leader may modify the data record sheet for this EM&A programme, of which the format should be agreed by the ER and the IEC.

Monitoring Equipment

2.2.4 High volume samplers (HVSs) in compliance with the following specifications shall be used for carrying out the 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring:

‧ 0.6 - 1.7 m³ per minute (20 - 60 standard cubic feet per minute) adjustable flow range;

‧ Equipped with a timing / control device with ± 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;

‧ Installed with elapsed-time meter with ± 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;

‧ Capable of providing a minimum exposed area of 406 cm² ;

‧ Flow control accuracy: ± 2.5% deviation over 24-hour sampling period;

‧ Equipped with a shelter to protect the filter and sampler;

‧ Incorporated with an electronic mass flow rate controller or other equivalent devices;

‧ Equipped with a flow recorder for continuous monitoring;

‧ Provided with a peaked roof inlet;

‧ Incorporated with a manometer;

‧ Able to hold and seal the filter paper to the sampler housing at horizontal position;

‧ Easy to change the filter;

‧ Capable of operating continuously for 24-hour period.

Mitigation Measures

2.2.32 Mitigation measures for construction dust are recommended in the EIA Report. The Contractor shall be responsible for the design and implementation of these measures.

2.2.33 In order to ensure compliance with the acceptable criteria at the ASRs at all time, requirements of the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation shall be adhered to during the construction period. Misting for any stockpile of materials and provision of windbreaks on three sides are proposed to prevent wind erosion. An environmental monitoring and auditing program shall be implemented to monitor the construction process in order to enforce controls and modify methods of work if dusty conditions are arisen. In addition, the following good site practices are recommended to minimise dust and other air pollutants impacts during excavation, transportation, and loading and unloading of dusty material:

‧ Stockpiling site(s) should be lined with impermeable sheeting and bunded. Stockpiles should be fully covered by impermeable sheeting to reduce dust emission.

‧ Misting for the dusty material should be carried out before being loaded into the vehicle.

‧ Any vehicle with an open load carrying area should have properly fitted side and tail boards.

‧ Material having the potential to create dust should not be loaded from a level higher than the side and tail boards and should be dampened and covered by a clean tarpaulin.

‧ The tarpaulin should be properly secured and should extent at least 300 mm over the edges of the sides and tailboards. The material should also be dampened if necessary before transportation.

‧ The vehicles should be restricted to maximum speed of 10 km per hour and confined haulage and delivery vehicle to designated roadways insider the site. On-site unpaved roads should be compacted and kept free of lose materials.

‧ Vehicle washing facilities should be provided at every vehicle exit point.

‧ The area where vehicle washing takes place and the section of the road between the washing facilities and the exit point should be paved with concrete, bituminous materials or hardcores.

‧ Every main haul road should be scaled with concrete and kept clear of dusty materials or sprayed with water so as to maintain the entire road surface wet.

‧ Every stock of more than 20 bags of cement should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting placed in an area sheltered on the top and the three sides.

‧ Every vehicle should be washed to remove any dusty materials from its body and wheels before leaving the construction sites.

2.2.34 The implementation schedule for the recommended air quality impact mitigation measures is presented in Appendices A and A1 respectively.

2.3 Noise Impact

Noise Parameters

Construction Phase

2.3.1 The construction noise level shall be measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_eq). L_eq ₍₃₀ _minutes) shall be used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. For all other time periods, Leq (5 minutes) shall be employed for comparison with the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) criteria.

2.3.2 Supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results such as L₁₀ and L₉₀ shall also be obtained for reference. A sample data record sheet based on the one presented in the EM&A Guidelines for Development Projects in Hong Kong is shown in Appendix B. The ET Leader may modify the data record sheet for this EM&A programme, of which the format should be agreed by the ER and the IEC.

Monitoring Equipment

2.3.3 As referred to in the Technical Memorandum (TM) issued under the NCO, sound level meters in compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise monitoring. Immediately prior to and following each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter shall be checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only if the calibration level from before and after the noise measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.

2.3.4 Noise measurements shall not be made in fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5 m/s or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. The wind speed shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in m/s.

2.3.5 The ET is responsible for the provision of the monitoring equipment. He shall ensure that sufficient noise measuring equipment and associated instrumentation are available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, regular impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring. All the equipment and associated instrumentation shall be clearly labelled.

Monitoring Locations

2.3.6 The locations of construction and operational noise monitoring stations are summarized in Table 2.4 and shown in Figure 2.2. These locations represent the worst affected sensitive receivers during construction.

Table 2.4 Noise Monitoring Stations

Noise Monitoring Station	NSR ID in EIA Report	Noise Monitoring Location
Construction Noise
M11	N18	The Hong Kong Society for the Blind’s Factory cum Sheltered Workshop
M12	PN83, PN84 and PN84A	Hong Kong Children’s Hospital

2.3.7 The status and locations of noise sensitive receivers may change after issuing this Manual. If such case exists, the ET Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations and seek approval from EPD and agreement from the ER and the IEC before baseline monitoring commences.

2.3.8 When alternative monitoring locations are proposed, the monitoring locations shall be chosen based on the following criteria:

(i) Monitoring at sensitive receivers close to the major site activities which are likely to have noise impacts;

(ii) Monitoring at the noise sensitive receivers as defined in the Technical Memorandum; and

(iii) Assurance of minimal disturbance to the occupants during monitoring.

2.3.9 The monitoring station shall normally be at a point 1 m from the exterior of the sensitive receiver building facade and be at a position 1.2 m above the ground. If there is problem with access to the normal monitoring position, an alternative position may be chosen, and a correction to the measurements shall be made. For reference, a correction of +3 dB(A) shall be made to the free field measurements. The ET shall agree with the IEC on the monitoring position and the corrections adopted. Once the positions for the monitoring stations are chosen, the baseline monitoring and the impact monitoring shall be carried out at the same positions.

Baseline Monitoring

Construction Phase

2.3.10 The ET shall carry out baseline noise monitoring prior to the commencement of the construction works. The baseline monitoring shall be carried out daily for a period of at least two weeks. Before commencing the baseline monitoring, the ET shall develop and submit to the IEC the baseline monitoring programme such that the IEC can conduct on-site audit to ensure accuracy of the baseline monitoring results.

2.3.11 There shall not be any construction activities in the vicinity of the stations during the baseline monitoring.

2.3.12 In exceptional cases, when insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results are obtained, the ET Leader shall liaise with the ER, EPD and IEC to agree on an appropriate set of data to be used as a baseline reference and submit to the ER and IEC for agreement and EPD for approval.

Impact Monitoring

Construction Phase

2.3.13 Noise monitoring shall be carried out at all the designated monitoring stations. The monitoring frequency shall depend on the scale of the construction activities. The following is an initial guide on the regular monitoring frequency for each station on a weekly basis when noise generating activities are underway:

· one set of measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays.

2.3.14 If construction works are extended to include works during the hours of 1900 – 0700 as well as public holidays and Sundays, additional weekly impact monitoring shall be carried out during respective restricted hours periods. Applicable permits under NCO shall be obtained by the Contractor.

2.3.15 If a school exists near the construction activity, noise monitoring shall be carried out at the monitoring stations for the schools during the school examination periods. The ET Leader shall liaise with the school’s personnel and the Examination Authority to ascertain the exact dates and times of all examination periods during the course of the contract.

2.3.16 In case of non-compliance with the construction noise criteria, more frequent monitoring, as specified in the Action Plan in Table 2.6, shall be carried out. This additional monitoring shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are rectified or demonstrated to be unrelated to the construction activities.

Event and Action Plan

Construction Phase

2.3.17 The Action and Limit levels for construction noise are defined in Table 2.5. Should non- compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Table 2.6 shall be implemented.

Table 2.5 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise

Time Period

Action Level

Limit Level

0700 – 1900 hours on

normal weekdays

When one documented compliant is received

75 dB(A) *

Notes: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed.

* 70 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) for schools during normal teaching periods and school examination periods, respectively.

Waste Reduction Measures

2.5.5 Good management and control can prevent the generation of a significant amount of waste. Waste reduction is best achieved at the planning and design stage, as well as by ensuring the implementation of good site practices. Recommendations to achieve waste reduction include:

· Sorting C&D waste from construction activities to recover recyclable portions such as metals;

· Segregation and storage of different types of waste in different containers, skips or stockpiles to enhance reuse or recycling of materials and their proper disposal;

· Encouraging collection of aluminium cans, PET bottles and paper by providing separate labelled bins to enable these wastes to be segregated from other general refuse generated by the work force;

· Recycling any unused chemicals or those with remaining functional capacity;

· Proper storage and site practices to minimise the potential for damage or contamination of construction materials;

· Planning and stocking construction materials carefully to minimise amount of waste generated and avoid unnecessary generation of waste.

2.5.6 In addition to the above measures, specific mitigation measures are recommended below for the identified waste arisings to minimise environmental impacts during handling, transportation and disposal of these wastes.

Construction and Demolition Material

2.5.7 The C&D material should be sorted on-site into inert C&D material (that is, public fill) and C&D waste. The inert C&D material would require disposal to the designated public fill reception facility. C&D waste, such as steel and other metals should be re-used or recycled and, as a last resort, disposed of to landfill. It is recommended that a suitable area be designated to facilitate the sorting process and a temporary stockpiling area will be required for the separated materials.

2.5.8 In order to monitor the disposal of public fill and C&D waste at public filling facilities and landfills, respectively, and to control fly tipping, a trip-ticket system should be included as one of the contractual requirements and implemented by the ET. The IEC should be responsible for auditing the results of the system.

General Refuse

2.5.9 General refuse should be stored in enclosed bins or compaction units separate from C&D material. A licensed waste collector should be employed by the Contractor to remove general refuse from the site, separately from C&D material. Effective collection and storage methods (including enclosed and covered area) of site wastes would be required to prevent waste materials from being blown around by wind, wastewater discharge by flushing or leaching into the marine environment or creating odour nuisance or pest and vermin problem.

Chemical Wastes

2.5.10 After use, chemical wastes (for example, cleaning fluids, solvents, lubrication oil and fuel) should be handled according to the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes. Spent chemicals should be collected by a licensed collector for disposal at the CWTF or other licensed facility, in accordance with the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation.

2.5.11 Table 2.7 provides a summary of the various waste types likely to be generated during the construction works, together with the recommended handling and disposal methods.

Table 2.7 Summary of Waste Handling Procedures and Disposal Routes

Waste Type

Generated From Works Item

Total Quantity Generated

Quantity to be disposed off-site / re- used

Handling

Disposal

C&D Material

Distributor roads serving the planned Kai Tak Development

2,217 m³ in total

Public fill / on-site reuse

Dust and water Dust quality mitigation measures

Sort on-site into Inert C&D material to be disposed off- site to the designated public fill reception facility, C&D material should be reused as far as practicable

Chemical Wastes

Lubrication oil, fuel etc. from operation, maintenance, and servicing of construction plant

Few cubic metres per month (preliminary estimate)

Recycle on-site or by licensed companies

Stored on-site within suitably designed containers

Chemical Waste Treatment Facility or other licensed facility

General Refuse

Waste paper, discarded containers etc. generated from workforce

Few cubic metres per month (preliminary estimate)

Provide on-site refuse collection points

Refuse station for compaction and containerisatio n and then to landfill

2.5.12 The implementation schedule of the recommended mitigation measures is presented in Appendices A and A1 respectively

2.6 Land Contamination Impact

2.6.1 The EIA study has evaluated the potential land contamination issues that may pose impacts on the construction of the new distributor roads. As indicated in the EIA study, no potential land contamination associated with Roads D1, D2 & D3 is anticipated; however potential land contamination impacts in association with the proposed Road D4 alignment were revealed from the land contamination investigations.

2.6.2 The proposed Road D4 alignment would encroach upon a small part of the sites of the ex- GFS building, the Radar Station and the EMSD Kowloon Bay Vehicle Repairing and Maintenance Workshop. Based on the findings of land contamination assessment, the extent of identified contamination within the ex-GFS building and the Radar Station does not fall within the alignment of Road D4, therefore adverse environmental impact of the ex-GFS building and the Radar Station in respect of land contamination on Road D4 is not anticipated. Therefore upon completion of any necessary decontamination works at the EMSD Kowloon Bay Vehicle Repairing and Maintenance Workshop, no adverse residual environmental impact in respect of land contamination on Road D4 is anticipated.

2.6.3 However, it should be noted that some small parts of the ex-GFS building and Radar Station including the transformer room and the generator room etc. were still under operation during the previous land contamination site investigation (SI), SI at those areas was not possible due to site accessibility and safety issues. For these remaining areas with potential land contamination concerns, a supplementary land contamination SI was recommended to be carried out upon the cessation of the operations under the Kai Tak Development Project. A supplementary sampling plan providing the sampling and laboratory analysis information for the supplementary SI in these areas has been provided in the respective CAR and CAR/RAP for Radar Station and ex-GFS building respectively.

2.6.4 During site investigation, no exceedances in Dutch B level were found among the soil samples collected in the areas surrounding the inaccessible areas in both Radar Station and ex-GFS building, contamination, if any, within those inaccessible areas are considered localized and surmountable and its impacts on the surrounding environment are considered to be minimal. It should be noted that those inaccessible areas do not fall within the alignment of Road D4 and thus any contamination identified within those inaccessible areas in the future would not affect the assessment on DP1 Project presented in this section.

2.6.5 For Electrical and Mechanical Services Department (EMSD) Kowloon Bay Vehicle Maintenance Workshop, EMSD as the current occupant shall conduct a detailed land contamination assessment and complete the necessary remediation prior to handing over the site back to the Government for construction of the proposed Road D4. The implementation schedule of the recommended mitigation measures is presented in Appendices A and A1 respectively.

2.6.6 With proper implementation and completion of the appropriate remediation action by EMSD for the Kowloon Bay Vehicle Maintenance Workshop site next to a section of Road D4, further mitigation measures with regards to land contamination would not be necessary for the construction and operation of this project. Hence, no environmental monitoring and audit requirements with regards to land contamination will be required for this project

2.7 Impact on Cultural Heritage

2.7.1 The proposed Road D1 is situated in an area of archaeological potential. The archaeological investigation recently conducted for KTD confirmed that there is no archaeological potential in the vicinity of Road D1 except the area around Trench AA3. Further archaeological investigation and rescue excavation for the area around Trench AA3 will be conducted as the mitigation recommendations for KTD. No further archaeological investigation or mitigation will be required for Road D1. Proposed Road D1 is not in the vicinity of any built heritage resources and no adverse impacts will arise from the construction of Road D1.

2.7.2 The alignment of Roads D3 and D4 are in the vicinity of Fire Station C together with its adjacent pole, runway and seawall. However, the construction of Roads D3 and Road D4 would not encroach onto the site of Fire Station C and its adjacent wind pole. Besides, the construction of Roads D3 and Road D4 would also not affect the seawall and the shape of the runway, no adverse impacts on built heritage resources will arise from the construction of Roads D3 and D4. Besides, since the proposed Roads D2, D3 and D4 are all located on reclaimed land, the construction of the proposed Roads D2, D3 and D4 will not cause any adverse impacts on archaeological resources.

2.7.3 No mitigation will be required for the proposed DP1 Project and no EM&A requirements will be necessary.

2.8 Landscape and Visual Impact

Introduction

2.8.1 The EIA has recommended landscape and visual mitigation measures to be undertaken during both the construction and operational phases of the project. This section outlines the monitoring and audit of these measures.

2.8.2 The sensitive receivers are shown in Figure 2.4A, 2.4B, 2.5A, 2.5B, 2.6A, 2.6B (AEIAR-130/2009).

Methodology and Criteria (AEIAR-130/2009 and AEIAR-170/2013)

2.8.3 The design, implementation and maintenance of landscape and visual mitigation measures should be checked to ensure that they are fully realized and that potential conflicts between the proposed landscape measures and any other project works and operational requirements are resolved at the earliest possible date and without compromise to the intention of the mitigation measures.

2.8.4 Site inspection and audit is necessary in the operation stage.

Table 2.8 Monitoring Programme (Table 2.8 of AEIAR-130/2009)

Stage	Monitoring Task	Monitoring Report	Form of Approval	Frequency
Design	Monitoring of design works against the recommendations of the landscape and visual impact assessments within the EIA should be undertaken during detailed design and tender stages, to ensure that they fulfil the intentions of the mitigation measures. Any changes to the design, including design changes on site should also be checked.	Report by ER confirming that the design conforms to requirements of EP	Approved by Client	At Completion of Design Stage
Construction	Monitoring of the contractor’s operations during the construction period.	Report on Contractor’s compliance, by ET	Counter-signature of report by IEC	Weekly
Establishment Works	Monitoring of the planting works during the 24-month Establishment period after completion of the construction works	Report on Contractor’s compliance, by ET	Counter-signature of report by IEC	3 months

Design (AEIAR-130/2009 & AEIAR-170/2013)

2.8.5 The mitigation measures proposed within the EIA to mitigate the landscape and visual impacts of the scheme should be embodied into the detailed engineering design and landscape design drawings and contract documents. Designs should be checked to ensure that the measures are fully incorporated and that potential conflicts with civil engineering, geo-technical, structural, lighting, signage, drainage, underground utility and operational requirements are resolved prior to construction.

Construction & Establishment Period (AEIAR-130/2009 & AEIAR-170/2013)

2.8.6 The implementation of landscape construction works and subsequent maintenance operations during the 12-month establishment period must be supervised by fully qualified Landscape Resident Site Staff (Registered Landscape Architect or Professional Member of the Hong Kong Institute of landscape Architects).

2.8.7 Measures to mitigate landscape and visual impacts during construction should be checked to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the measures.

2.8.8 The progress of the engineering works shall be regularly reviewed on site to identify the earliest practical opportunities for the landscape works to be undertaken.

Baseline Monitoring (AEIAR-130/2009 & AEIAR-170/2013)

2.8.9 A one off survey shall be conducted prior to commencement of any construction works. A photographic record of the site at the time of the contractor’s possession of the site shall be prepared by the Contractor and approved by the ER. The approved photographic Record shall be submitted to the Project proponent, ET, IEC and EPD for record.

Event/Action Plan for Landscape and Visual Works (AEIAR-130/2009 & AEIAR-170/2013)

2.8.10 Should non-compliance of the landscape and visual impacts occur, actions in accordance with the action plan stated in Table 2.9 should be carried out.

Table 2.9 Event and Action Plan for Landscape and Visual Impact (Table 2.9 of AEIAR-130/2009 & Table 6.2 of AEIAR-170/2013)

EVENT ACTION LEVEL	ACTION
EVENT ACTION LEVEL	ET	IEC	ER	CONTRACTOR
Design Check	· Check final design conforms to the requirements of EP and prepare report.	· Check report. · Recommend remedial design if necessary	· Undertake remedial design if necessary
Non- conformity on one occasion	· Identify Source · Inform IEC and ER · Discuss remedial actions with IEC, ER and Contractor · Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed	· Check report · Check Contractor's working method · Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures · Advise ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures. · Check implementatio n of remedial measures.	· Notify Contractor · Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented	· Amend working methods · Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement
Repeated Non- conformity	· Identify Source · Inform IEC and ER · Increase monitoring frequency · Discuss remedial actions with IEC, ER and Contractor · Monitor remedial actions until rectification has been completed · If non- conformity stops, cease additional monitoring	· Check monitoring report · Check Contractor's working method · Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures · Advise ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures · Supervise implementation of remedial measures.	· Notify Contractor · Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented	· Amend working methods · Rectify damage and undertake any necessary replacement

Mitigation Measures

2.8.11 The landscape and visual impact assessment of the EIA recommends a series on mitigation measures, as noted below:

Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures during Construction Phase

(a) CM1

· All existing trees should be carefully protected during construction (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Minimised construction area and contractor’s temporary works areas (AEIAR-170/2013).

(b) CM2

· Trees unavoidably affected by the works should be transplanted where practical. Detailed transplanting proposal will be submitted to relevant government departments for approval in accordance with ETWBC 2/2004 and 3/2006. Final locations of transplanted trees should be agreed prior to commencement of the work (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Control of night-time lighting and glare by hooding all lights (AEIAR-170/2013)

· Control of night-time lighting (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Erection of decorative mesh screens or construction hoardings around works areas in visually unobtrusive colours (AEIAR-170/2013)

(d) CM4

· Erection of decorative screen hoarding (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Reduction of construction period to practical minimum (AEIAR-170/2013)

(e) CM5

· Limitation of / ensuring no run-off into surrounding landscape and adjacent water sea areas (AEIAR-170/2013)

(f) CM6

· Temporary or advance landscape should be provided along the temporary access roads to the Cruise Terminal until such time as road D3 is open (AEIAR-170/2013)

Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase

(a) OM1

· Compensatory tree planting should be incorporated into the proposed projects where trees are affected (AEIAR-130/2009).

· All above ground structures shall be sensitively designed with regard to the form, material and finishes and shall respond to the existing and planned urban context (AEIAR-170/2013).

(b) OM2

· Tall buffer screen tree / shrub / climber planting should be incorporated to soften hard engineering structures and facilities (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Streetscape elements shall be sensitively designed in a manner that responds to the existing and planned urban context (AEIAR-170/2013).

· Sensitive streetscape design should be incorporated along all new roads to reflect the new urban development in Kai Tak (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Attractive soft landscape in areas adjoining any visible structures such as tall buffer screen tree/shrub/climber planting, vertical greening and roof greening where appropriate should be incorporated so as to provide a visual softening and greening effect and soften hard engineering structures and facilities (AEIAR-170/2013).

(d) OM4

· Structure, ornamental tree / shrub / climber planting should be provided along roadside amenity strips and central dividers to enhance the townscape quality, where space is available (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Structure, ornamental tree/shrub/climber planting should be provided along roadside amenity strips to enhance the townscape quality, where space is available (AEIAR-170/2013)

(e) OM5

· Aesthetically pleasing design as regard to the form, material and finishes should be incorporated to all buildings, engineering structures and associated infrastructure facilities (AEIAR-130/2009).

· Appropriate design of street lighting to avoid glare and light pollution to surrounding areas (AEIAR-170/2013) (OM5)

(f) OM6

· Avoidance of excessive height and bulk of the associated landscaped deck to the central boulevard (AEIAR-170/2013).

(g) OM7

· Elegant engineering design, sensitive architectural and chromatic treatment and generous planting of the associated landscaped deck to the central boulevard. The form, color and surface detailing of these structures should be carefully considered to reduce their apparent height and bulk (visual weight) (AEIAR-170/2013).

(h) OM8

· Sensitive design of noise barriers & enclosures with greening (screen planting/climbers/green roofs) and chromic measures (AEIAR-170/2013).

(i) OM9

· Compensatory Tree Planting for felled trees (AEIAR-170/2013)

3 EM&A ON NEW SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS SERVING THE PLANNED KTD (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

4 EM&A ON DECOMMSIONNING OF THE REMAINING PARTS (EX-GFS BUILDING AND RADAR STATION) OF THE FORMER KAI TAK AIRPORT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

5 AIR QUALITY IMPACT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

6 NOISE IMPACT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

7 WATER QUALITY IMPACT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

8 WASTE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

9 LAND CONTAMINATION (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

10 IMPACT ON CULTURAL HERITAGE (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

11 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

12 FISHERIES IMPACT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

13 ECOLOGY IMPACT (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

14 HAZARD TO LIFE (AEIAR-130/2009)

Not Applicable

15 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT

15.1 Site Inspections

15.1.1 Site inspection provides a direct means to trigger and enforce specified environmental protection and pollution control measures. These shall be undertaken regularly and routinely to inspect construction activities in order to ensure that appropriate environmental protection and pollution control mitigation measures are properly implemented. The site inspection is one of the most effective tools to enforce the environmental protection requirements at the works area.

15.1.2 The ET Leader shall be responsible for formulating the environmental site inspection, the deficiency and remedial action reporting system, and for carrying out the site inspection works. The ET Leader shall submit a proposal for site inspection and deficiency and remedial action reporting procedures to the Contractor for agreement, and to the ER for approval. The ET’s proposal for rectification would be made known to the IEC.

15.1.3 Regular site inspections shall be carried out at least once per week. The areas of inspection shall not be limited to the environmental situation and the pollution control and mitigation measures within the site, it should also review the environmental situation outside the works area which is likely to be affected directly or indirectly by the site activities. The ET shall make reference to the following information in conducting the inspection:

· The EIA and EM&A recommendations on environmental protection and pollution control mitigation measures;

· Ongoing results of the EM&A program;

· Works progress and programme;

· Individual works methodology proposals (which shall include proposal on associated pollution control measures);

· Contract specifications on environmental protection and pollution prevention control;

· Relevant environmental protection and pollution control laws;

· Previous site inspection results undertaken by the ET and others.

15.1.4 The Contractor shall keep the ET Leader updated with all relevant information on the construction contract necessary for him/her to carry out the site inspections. Inspection results and associated recommendations for improvements to the environmental protection and pollution control works shall be submitted to the IEC and the Contractor within 24 hours for reference and for taking immediate remedial action. The Contractor shall follow the procedures and time-frame stipulated in the environmental site inspection, and the deficiency and remedial action reporting system formulated by the ET Leader, to report on any remedial measures subsequent to the site inspections.

15.1.5 The ET shall also carry out ad hoc site inspections if significant environmental problems are identified. Inspections may also be required subsequent to receipt of an environmental complaint, or as part of the investigation work, as specified in the Event and Action Plan for environmental monitoring and audit.

15.2 Compliance with Legal and Contractual Requirements

15.2.1 There are contractual environmental protection and pollution control requirements as well as environmental protection and pollution control laws in Hong Kong with which construction activities must comply.

15.2.2 In order that the works are in compliance with the contractual requirements, all works method statements submitted by the Contractor to the ER for approval shall be sent to the ET Leader for vetting to see whether sufficient environmental protection and pollution control measures have been included. The implementation schedule of mitigation measures is summarised in Appendices A and A1 respectively.

15.2.3 The ET Leader shall also review the progress and programme of the works to check that relevant environmental laws have not been violated, and that any foreseeable potential for violating laws can be prevented.

15.2.4 The Contractor shall regularly copy relevant documents to the ET Leader so that works checking could be carried out effectively. The document shall at least include the updated Works Progress Reports, updated Works Programme, any application letters for different licence / permits under the environmental protection laws, and copies of all valid licences / permits. The site diary shall also be available for the ET Leader's inspection upon his/her request.

15.2.5 After reviewing the documentation, the ET Leader shall advise the Contractor of any non- compliance with contractual and legislative requirements on environmental protection and pollution control for them to take follow-up actions. If the ET Leader's review concludes that the current status on licence / permit application and any environmental protection and pollution control preparation works may result in potential violation of environmental protection and pollution control requirements, he/she shall also advise the Contractor accordingly.

15.2.6 Upon receipt of the advice, the Contractor shall undertake immediate action to remedy the situation. The ER shall follow up to ensure that appropriate action has been taken in order to satisfy contractual and legal requirements.

15.3 Environmental Complaints

15.3.1 Complaints shall be referred to the ET Leader for action. The ET Leader shall undertake the following procedures upon receipt of any complaint:

‧ Log complaint and date of receipt onto the complaint database and inform the IEC immediately;

‧ Investigate the complaint to determine its validity, and assess whether the source of the problem is due to works activities;

‧ Identify mitigation measures in consultation with the IEC if a complaint is valid and due to works;

‧ Advise the Contractor if mitigation measures are required;

‧ Review the Contractor's response to identified mitigation measures, and the updated situation;

‧ If the complaint is transferred from EPD, submit interim report to EPD on status of the complaint investigation and follow-up action within the time frame assigned by EPD;

‧ Undertake additional monitoring and audit to verify the situation if necessary, and review that circumstances leading to the complaint do not recur;

‧ Report investigation results and subsequent actions to complainant (if the source of complaint is identified through EPD, the results should be reported within the timeframe assigned by EPD);

‧ Record the complaint, investigation, the subsequent actions and the results in the monthly EM&A reports.

15.3.2 A flow chart of the complaint response procedures is shown in Figure 15.1.

16 REPORTING

16.1 General

16.1.1 The EM&A reporting shall be carried out in paper based plus electronic submission upon agreeing the format with the ER and EPD. All the monitoring data (baseline and impact) shall also be submitted in electronic format. The formats for air quality, noise and water quality monitoring data to be submitted on diskette are shown in Appendix B.

16.1.2 Types of reports that the ET Leader shall prepare and submit include baseline monitoring report, monthly EM&A report, quarterly EM&A summary report and final EM&A review report. In accordance with Annex 21 of the EIAO-TM, a copy of the monthly, quarterly summary and final review EM&A reports shall be made available to the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP).

16.2 Electronic Reporting of EM&A Information

16.2.1 To facilitate public inspection of the baseline monitoring report and various EM&A reports via the EIAO internet website and at the EIAO Register Office, electronic copies of these reports shall be prepared in Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in Portable Document Format (PDF version 4.0 or later), unless otherwise agreed by EPD and shall be submitted at the same time as the hardcopies. For the HTML version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to each section and sub-section of these reports shall be included at the beginning of the document. Hyperlinks to all figures, drawings and tables in these reports shall be provided in the main text from where the respective references are made. All graphics in these reports shall be in interlaced GIF format unless otherwise agreed by EPD. The content of the electronic copies of these reports must be the same as the hard copies. The summary of the monitoring data taken shall be included in the various EM&A reports to allow for public inspection via the EIAO internet website.

16.3 Baseline Monitoring Report

16.3.1 The ET Leader shall prepare and submit a Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report within 10 working days of completion of the baseline monitoring. Copies of the Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the Contractor, the IEC, the ER and EPD. The ET Leader shall liaise with the relevant parties on the exact number of copies they require.

16.3.2 The baseline monitoring report shall include, but not be limited to the following:

(i) Up to half a page executive summary;

(ii) Brief project background information;

(iii) Drawings showing locations of the baseline monitoring stations;

(iv) An updated construction programme with milestones of environmental protection / mitigation activities annotated;

(v) Monitoring results (in both hard and soft copies) together with the following information:

· Monitoring methodology;

· Name of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details;

· Parameters monitored;

· Monitoring locations;

· Monitoring date, time, frequency and duration; and

· Quality assurance (QA) / quality control (QC) results and detection limits.

(vi) Details on influencing factors, including:

· Major activities, if any, being carried out on the site during the period;

· Weather conditions during the period; and

· Other factors which might affect results.

(vii) Determination of the Action and Limit Levels (AL Levels) for each monitoring parameter and statistical analysis of the baseline data, the analysis shall conclude if there is any significant difference between control and impact stations for the parameters monitored;

(viii) Revisions for inclusion in the EM&A Manual; and

(ix) Comments, recommendations and conclusions.

16.4 Monthly EM&A Reports

16.4.1 The results and findings of all EM&A work required in this Manual shall be recorded in the monthly EM&A reports prepared by the ET Leader. The EM&A report shall be prepared and submitted within 10 working days at the end of each reporting month, with the first report due the month after construction commences. Each monthly EM&A report shall be submitted to the following parties: the Contractor, the IEC, the ER and EPD. Before submission of the first EM&A report, the ET Leader shall liaise with the parties on the required number of copies and format of the monthly reports in both hard copy and electronic medium.

16.4.2 The ET Leader shall review the number and location of monitoring stations and parameters every six months, or on as needed basis, in order to cater for any changes in the surrounding environment and the nature of works in progress.

16.5 First Monthly EM&A Report

16.5.1 The first monthly EM&A report shall include at least but not be limited to the following:

(i) Executive summary (1-2 pages):

· Breaches of Action and Limit Levels;

· Complaint log;

· Notifications of any summons and successful prosecutions;

· Reporting changes; and

· Future key issues.

(ii) Basic project information:

· Project organisation including key personnel contact names and telephone numbers;

· Construction programme with fine tuning of construction activities showing the inter-relationship with environmental protection / mitigation measures for the month;

· Management structure; and

· Works undertaken during the month.

(iii) Environmental status:

· Works undertaken during the month with illustrations; and

· Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations (with co-ordinates of the monitoring locations);

· Advice on the status of statutory environmental compliance, the status of compliance with environmental permit (EP) conditions under the EIA Ordinance, submission status under the EP and implementation status of mitigation measures.

(iv) A brief summary of EM&A requirements including:

· All monitoring parameters;

· Environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels);

· Event and Action Plans;

· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report; and

· Environmental requirements in contract documents.

(v) Implementation status:

· Advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and pollution control / mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report, summarised in the updated implementation schedule.

(vi) Monitoring results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following information:

· Monitoring methodology;

· Name of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details;

· Parameters monitored;

· Monitoring locations;

· Monitoring date, time, frequency, and duration;

· Weather conditions during the period;

· Graphical plots of the monitored parameters in the month annotated against:

- The major activities being carried out on site during the period;

- Weather conditions that may affect the results; and

- Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results.

· Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results; and

· Quality assurance (QA) / quality control (QC) results and detection limits.

(vii) Report on non-compliance, complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions:

· Record of all non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels);

· Record of all complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, including locations and nature of complaints investigation, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken, results and summary;

· Record of all notification of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of current environmental protection / pollution control legislations, including locations and nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken, results and summary;

· Review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, complaints, summons and prosecutions including review of pollution sources and working procedures; and

· Description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance and deficiency reporting and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance.

(viii) Others:

· Compare and contrast the EM&A data in the month with the EIA predictions and annotate with explanation for any discrepancies;

· An account of the future key issues as reviewed from the works programme and work method statements;

· Advice on the solid and liquid waste management status during the month including waste generation and disposal records; and

· Comments including effectiveness of the environmental management systems, practices, procedures, mitigation measures, recommendations (for example, any improvement in the EM&A programme) and conclusions.

16.6 Subsequent EM&A Reports

16.6.1 Subsequent monthly EM&A reports shall include the following:

(i) Executive summary (1 - 2 pages):

l Breaches of Action and Limit Levels;

l Complaints log;

l Notifications of any summons and successful prosecutions;

l Reporting changes; and

l Future key issues.

(ii) Environmental status:

l Construction programme with fine tuning of construction activities showing the inter-relationship with environmental protection / mitigation measures for the month;

l Works undertaken during the month with illustrations including key personnel contact names and telephone numbers;

l Drawing showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations; and

l Advice on the status of statutory environmental compliance, the status of compliance with environmental permit (EP) conditions under the EIA Ordinance, submission status under the EP and implementation status of mitigation measures.

(iii) Implementation status:

l Advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and pollution control / mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report, summarised in the updated implementation schedule.

(iv) Monitoring results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following information:

l Monitoring methodology;

l Name of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details;

l Parameters monitored;

l Monitoring locations;

l Monitoring date, time, frequency, and duration;

l Weather conditions during the period;

l Graphical plots of the monitored parameters in the month annotated against;

- The major activities being carried out on site during the period;

- Weather conditions that may affect the results; and

- Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results.

l Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results; and

l Quality assurance (QA) / quality control (QC) results and detection limits.

(v) Report on non-compliance, complaints, and notifications of summons and successful prosecutions:

l Record of all non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels);

l Record of all complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, including locations and nature of complaints investigation, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken, results and summary;

l Record of all notification of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of current environmental protection / pollution control legislations, including locations and nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken, results and summary;

l Review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, complaints, summons and prosecutions including review of pollution sources and working procedures; and

l Description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance and deficiency reporting and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance.

(vi) Others:

l Compare and contrast the EM&A data in the month with the EIA predictions and annotate with explanation for any discrepancies;

l An account of the future key issues as reviewed from the works programme and work method statements;

l Advice on the solid and liquid waste management status during the month including waste generation and disposal records; and

l Comments including effectiveness of the environmental management systems, practices, procedures, mitigation measures, recommendations (for example, any improvement in the EM&A programme) and conclusions.

(vii) Appendix

l Action and Limit Levels;

l Graphical plots of trends of monitored parameters at key stations over the past four reporting periods for representative monitoring stations annotated against the following:

- Major activities being carried out on site during the period;

- Weather conditions during the period; and

- Any other factors that might affect the monitoring results.

l Monitoring schedule for the present and next reporting period;

l Cumulative statistics on complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions;

l Outstanding issues and deficiencies.

16.7 Quarterly EM&A Summary Reports

16.7.1 A quarterly EM&A summary report of around five pages shall be produced and shall contain at least the following information. Apart from these, the first quarterly summary report should also confirm that the monitoring work is proving effective and that it is generating data with the necessary statistical power to categorically identify or confirm the absence of impact attributable to the works.

(i) Executive summary (1 - 2 pages);

(ii) Basic project information including a synopsis of the project organisation, programme, contacts of key management, and a synopsis of works undertaken during the quarter;

(iii) A brief summary of EM&A requirements including:

· Monitoring parameters;

· Environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels); and

· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report.

(iv) Advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and pollution control

/ mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report, summarised in the updated implementation schedule;

(v) Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations;

(vi) Graphical plots of the trends of monitored parameters over the past four months (the last month of the previous quarter and the present quarter) for representative monitoring stations annotated against:

· The major activities being carried out on site during the period;

· Weather conditions during the period; and

· Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results.

(vii) Advice on the solid and liquid waste management status during the quarter including waste generation and disposal records;

(viii) Compare and contrast the EM&A data in the month with the EIA predictions and annotate with explanation for any discrepancies;

(ix) A summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels);

(x) A brief review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, including a review of pollution sources and working procedures;

(xi) A summary description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance;

(xii) A summarised record of all complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken;

(xiii) A summary record of notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental protection / pollution control legislations, locations and nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken and results;

(xiv) Comments (for examples, a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation measures and the performance of the environmental management system, that is, of the overall EM&A programme); recommendations (for example, any improvement in the EM&A programme) and conclusions for the quarter; and

(xv) Proponents' contacts and any hotline telephone number for the public to make enquiries.

16.8 Final EM&A Review Reports

16.8.1 The EM&A program shall be terminated upon completion of those construction activities that have the potential to result in a significant environmental impact.

16.8.2 Prior to the proposed termination, it may be advisable to consult relevant local communities. The proposed termination should only be implemented after the proposal has been endorsed by the IEC, the Engineer and the Project Proponent followed by final approval from the Director of Environmental Protection.

16.8.3 The final EM&A report should contain at least the following information:

(i) Executive summary (1 - 2 pages);

(ii) Basic project information including a synopsis of the project organisation, contacts of key management, and a synopsis of work undertaken during the course of the Project or past twelve months;

(iii) A brief summary of EM&A requirements including:

· Monitoring parameters;

· Environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels); and

· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report.

(iv) Advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and pollution control / mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA report, summarised in the updated implementation status proformas;

(v) Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations;

(vi) Graphical plots of the trends of monitored parameters over the course of the Project, including the post-project monitoring for all monitoring stations annotated against:

· The major activities being carried out on site during the period;

· Weather conditions during the period; and

· Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results;

· The return of ambient environmental conditions in comparison with baseline data.

(vii) Compare and contrast the EM&A data with the EIA predictions and annotate with explanation for any discrepancies;

(viii) Provide clear-cut decisions on the environmental acceptability of the Project with reference to the specific impact hypothesis;

(ix) Advice on the solid and liquid waste management status including waste generation and disposal records;

(x) A summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels);

(xi) A brief review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance including review of pollution sources and working procedures;

(xii) A summary description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance;

(xiii) A summary record of all complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken;

(xiv) Review monitoring methodology adopted and with the benefit of hindsight, comment on its effectiveness (including cost effectiveness);

(xv) A summary record of notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental protection/pollution control legislations, locations and nature of breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken and results;

(xvi) Review the practicality and effectiveness of the EIA process and EM&A programme (for examples, a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation measures and the performance of the environmental management system, that is, of the overall EM&A programme), recommendations (for example, any improvement in the EM&A programme); and

(xvii) A conclusion to state the return of ambient and / or the predicted scenario as per EIA findings.

16.9 Data Keeping

16.9.1 No site-based documents (such as monitoring field records, laboratory analysis records, site inspection forms, etc.) are required to be included in the monthly EM&A reports. However, any such document shall be well kept by the ET Leader and be ready for inspection upon request. All relevant information shall be clearly and systematically recorded in the document. Monitoring data shall also be recorded in electronic format, and the software copy must be available upon request. Data format shall be agreed with EPD. All documents and data shall be kept for at least one year following completion of the construction contract.

16.10 Interim Notifications of Environmental Quality Limit Exceedances

16.9.2 With reference to the Event and Action Plan, when the environmental quality performance limits are exceeded, the ET Leader shall immediately notify the IEC and EPD, as appropriate. The notification shall be followed up with advice to IEC and EPD on the results of the investigation, proposed actions and success of the actions taken, with any necessary follow-up proposals. A sample template for the interim notifications is presented in Appendix C.

Location	ASR ID in EIA	Description
AM3	A40	Sky Tower
AM4(A)	A43	The Hong Kong Society for the Blind’s Factory cum Sheltered Workshop
AM7	PA59	Hong Kong Children’s Hospital

Parameter	Action Level ⁽¹⁾	Limit Level
24-hour average TSP	BL ? 200 μg m^-3, AL = (BL * 1.3 + LL)/2 BL > 200 μg m^-3, AL = LL	260 μg m^-3
1-hour average TSP	BL ? 384 μg m^-3, AL = (BL * 1.3 + LL)/2 BL > 384 μg m^-3, AL = LL	500 μg m^-3

EVENT	ACTION
EVENT	ET	IEC	ER	CONTRACTOR
Action Level being exceeded	1. Notify ER, IEC and Contractor; 2. Carry out investigation; 3. Report the results of investigation to the IEC, ER and Contractor; 4. Discuss with the IEC and Contractor on remedial measures required; 5. Increase monitoring frequency to check mitigation effectiveness. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)	1. Review the investigation results submitted by the ET; 2. Review the proposed remedial measures by the Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; 3. Advise the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)	1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. In consolidation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures to be implemented; 4. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)	1. Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC and ER; 2. Implement noise mitigation proposals. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)
Limit Level being exceeded	1. Inform IEC, ER, Contractor and EPD; 2. Repeat measurements to confirm findings;	1. Discuss amongst ER, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 2. Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)	1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. In consolidation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures to be implemented; 4. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures; 5. If exceedance continues, consider stopping the Contractor to continue working on that portion of work which causes the exceedance until the exceedance is abated. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)	1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC and ER within 3 working days of notification; 3. Implement the agreed proposals; 4. Submit further proposal if problem still not under control; 5. Stop the relevant portion of works as instructed by the ER until the exceedance is abated. (The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)
	3. Increase monitoring frequency;
	4. Identify source and investigate the cause of exceedance;
	5. Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures;
	6. Discuss with the IEC, Contractor and ER on remedial measures required;
	7. Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results;
	8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring.
	(The above actions should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified)